<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>ice crums</title>
	
	<link>http://icecrums.com</link>
	<description>geekery 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/icecrums" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Motorola Developer Platform Powered by WebKit?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/457561833/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/18/motorla-developer-platform-powered-by-webkit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[motorla]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorola&#8217;s new WebUI widget platform is powered by Apple&#8217;s open source HTML renderer WebKit and is now holding a contest to lure developers to it&#8217;s platform: 
This contest is for building &#8220;WebUI&#8221; widgets &#8212; a platform based on Apple&#8217;s WebKit Web browser guts &#8212; which Motorola&#8217;s Web site says is for &#8220;Motorola&#8217;s open mobile Linux [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola&#8217;s new WebUI widget platform is powered by Apple&#8217;s open source HTML renderer WebKit and is now holding a contest to lure developers to it&#8217;s platform: </p>
<blockquote><p>This contest is for building &#8220;WebUI&#8221; widgets &#8212; a platform based on Apple&#8217;s WebKit Web browser guts &#8212; which Motorola&#8217;s Web site says is for &#8220;Motorola&#8217;s open mobile Linux platform.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Nokia, Google(Chrome and Android), iPhone, and now Motorola all on WebKit, I wonder why&#8230;</p>
<p>(VIa <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/11/motorola-s-plan-to-pull-coders-from-iphone-bribery" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.alleyinsider.com');">Alley Insider</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/457561833" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/18/motorla-developer-platform-powered-by-webkit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/18/motorla-developer-platform-powered-by-webkit/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Pass the Colombian Trade Pact</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/457442769/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/18/pass-the-colombian-trade-pact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[colombia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nytimes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t get:
Because of trade preferences granted as part of the war on drugs, most Colombian exports already are exempt from United States tariffs. The new agreement would benefit American companies that now have to pay high tariffs on exports to Colombia. 
The Democratic majority congress is still playing politics against Bush, even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t get:</p>
<blockquote><p>Because of trade preferences granted as part of the war on drugs, most Colombian exports already are exempt from United States tariffs. The new agreement would benefit American companies that now have to pay high tariffs on exports to Colombia. </p></blockquote>
<p>The Democratic majority congress is still playing politics against Bush, even after the Obama win. US companies would benefit more than the Colombian ones with this pact, and still they don&#8217;t want to approve it. US companies need to increase exports as the the economy tanks. Colombia is the third largest country in Latin America(after Brazil and Mexico), thus it&#8217;s a big partially untapped market. The war on drugs and terror is at is almost won thanks to the President Alvaro Uribe&#8217;s security and economic policies. By saying NO to Colombia, they are saying no to a President with 84% popularity, thus saying no to 84% of the colombian population.  President elect Barack Obama wants to change the face of the US in the eyes of the world. Why not start by endorsing a President with 84% approval? This will be easy peasy compared to the gargantuan tasks that awaits in the Middle East!</p>
<p>Colombia is the last South American ally the US has, and still they choose to ignore them because of supposed human rights violations(shit happens when you have rebells inside hurting the civilian population). </p>
<p>The time is now, to build strong alliances and keep Colombia from going left like Venezuela, Bolivia, Chile, Argentina, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Brazil in the upcoming 2010 Colombian elections. </p>
<p>(Link <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/opinion/18tue1.html?_r=1&#038;scp=1&#038;sq=colombia+free+trade+lame+duck&#038;st=nyt&#038;oref=slogin" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.nytimes.com');">NYTimes</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/457442769" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/18/pass-the-colombian-trade-pact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/18/pass-the-colombian-trade-pact/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Speeding Up Rails Development</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/454664201/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/16/speeding-up-rails-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[textmate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Neath&#8217;s useful tips and tricks to get a jump start on new rails projects. Everything from using a skeleton app to writing your own scaffold generators. But by far the best one is:
Seriously, Just Buy a Fucking Mac
Can&#8217;t argue with that now or can you?
(Via Jim Neath.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Neath&#8217;s useful tips and tricks to get a jump start on new rails projects. Everything from using a skeleton app to writing your own scaffold generators. But by far the best one is:</p>
<blockquote><p>Seriously, Just Buy a Fucking Mac</p></blockquote>
<p>Can&#8217;t argue with that now or can you?</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://jimneath.org/2008/11/15/speeding-up-rails-development/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/jimneath.org');">Jim Neath</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/454664201" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/16/speeding-up-rails-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/16/speeding-up-rails-development/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Computer Feeling When Selling a Used Mac</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/453367830/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/14/the-new-computer-feeling-when-selling-a-used-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve ever sold a Mac before, and cleaned installed it for your customer, you have probably had to create the new user(which is awkward), because you had no choice. Turns our there is. As Dan Benjamin point out:
After installation, when you’re prompted to create a new user, just press Command-Q.
Other great tips and tricks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve ever sold a Mac before, and cleaned installed it for your customer, you have probably had to create the new user(which is awkward), because you had no choice. Turns our there is. As Dan Benjamin point out:</p>
<blockquote><p>After installation, when you’re prompted to create a new user, just press Command-Q.</p></blockquote>
<p>Other great tips and tricks when selling a Mac in the link below.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://danbenjamin.com/articles/2008/11/how-to-prepare-a-mac-for-sale" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/danbenjamin.com');">The Narrative</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/453367830" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/14/the-new-computer-feeling-when-selling-a-used-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/14/the-new-computer-feeling-when-selling-a-used-mac/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Myth #1: Rails is hard to deploy</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/452634705/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/14/myth-1-rails-is-hard-to-deploy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[capistrano]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mod_rails]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phusion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Heinemeier Hansson goes myth buster on rails deployment. Got to be honest, it took me a while to appreciate it, but now I think it&#8217;s more organized than deploying a php app, thanks to Capistrano. His conclusion:
Rails is no longer hard to deploy. Phusion Passenger has made it ridiculously easy.
Tried it last week, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Heinemeier Hansson goes myth buster on rails deployment. Got to be honest, it took me a while to appreciate it, but now I think it&#8217;s more organized than deploying a php app, thanks to Capistrano. His conclusion:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rails is no longer hard to deploy. Phusion Passenger has made it ridiculously easy.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tried it last week, and I have to agree.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.loudthinking.com/posts/30-myth-1-rails-is-hard-to-deploy" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.loudthinking.com');">Loudthinking </a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/452634705" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/14/myth-1-rails-is-hard-to-deploy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/14/myth-1-rails-is-hard-to-deploy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>11 Twitter business models</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/449071975/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/10/11-twitter-business-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are going to need a business model very, very soon. They have a lot of revenue options and have enough people to try a few, and see what works best. My favorite:
Sell access to either the Twitter API or &#8220;firehose.&#8221;
(Link Webware.com.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are going to need a business model very, very soon. They have a lot of revenue options and have enough people to try a few, and see what works best. My favorite:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sell access to either the Twitter API or &#8220;firehose.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>(Link <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/webware/~3/445655674/8301-17939_109-10084487-2.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/feeds.feedburner.com');">Webware.com</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/449071975" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/10/11-twitter-business-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/10/11-twitter-business-models/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft considers adopting WebKit for Internet Explorer?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/445122064/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/07/microsoft-considers-adopting-webkit-for-internet-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That would really be the most embarrassing thing ever for Microsoft. Hopefully it will happen. No matter if they stick to IE 8 or not, they need to do something about IE 6. I will never understand what&#8217;s taken them so long to upgrade people to IE 7.
(Via AppleInsider.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would really be the most embarrassing thing ever for Microsoft. Hopefully it will happen. No matter if they stick to IE 8 or not, they need to do something about IE 6. I will never understand what&#8217;s taken them so long to upgrade people to IE 7.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/06/microsofts_ballmer_considers_using_webkit_within_ie.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.appleinsider.com');">AppleInsider</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/445122064" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/07/microsoft-considers-adopting-webkit-for-internet-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/07/microsoft-considers-adopting-webkit-for-internet-explorer/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The $700 Billion Bailout and Small Businesses</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/445079720/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/06/the-700-billion-bailout-and-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[downturn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[loan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[small businesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Hillegas from the Big Nerd Ranch on how the $700 Billon bailout directly affects him money. Most people complain about it and generalize that the tax payers will pay for it, but never explain how. Find out.  
(Link Aaron Hillegas.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Hillegas from the Big Nerd Ranch on how the $700 Billon bailout directly affects him money. Most people complain about it and generalize that the tax payers will pay for it, but never explain how. Find out.  </p>
<p>(Link <a href="http://www.possibleprobable.com/?p=106" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.possibleprobable.com');">Aaron Hillegas</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/445079720" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/06/the-700-billion-bailout-and-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/11/06/the-700-billion-bailout-and-small-businesses/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments on the New Cocoa Finder</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/437293088/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/10/30/comments-on-the-new-cocoa-finder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cocoa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[finder]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Gruber:
Everyone out there with a stiffy for the “rewritten in Cocoa” Snow Leopard Finder needs to get a grip. Cocoa is just an API. It is not some sort of magic technology where you just sprinkle a ton of square brackets in your source code and you instantly get a better UI.
From a user’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/10/30/cocoa-finder" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/daringfireball.net');">John Gruber</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Everyone out there with a stiffy for the “rewritten in Cocoa” Snow Leopard Finder needs to get a grip. Cocoa is just an API. It is not some sort of magic technology where you just sprinkle a ton of square brackets in your source code and you instantly get a better UI.</p>
<p>From a user’s perspective, the Snow Leopard Finder is going to be pretty much the exact same turd we’ve had in Mac OS X all along.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://inessential.com/?comments=1&#038;postid=3175" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/inessential.com');">Brent Simmons</a> three years ago:</p>
<blockquote><p>But Cocoa can’t, on its own, fix problems with a flawed design.</p>
<p>The problem with the Finder is really a people problem: it will get fixed if and when somebody with the authority, resources, and will to fix it appears.</p>
<p>Cocoa is no magic bullet—there aren’t any magic bullets.</p></blockquote>
<p>A Cocoa Finder is a nice idea, but what we really need is something like <a href="http://www.cocoatech.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.cocoatech.com');">Pathfinder</a> to be the default Finder. Supporting Tabs, would be my most desired feature for a new Finder. </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/437293088" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/10/30/comments-on-the-new-cocoa-finder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/10/30/comments-on-the-new-cocoa-finder/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How Low Can Moto Go?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~3/437123249/</link>
		<comments>http://icecrums.com/2008/10/30/how-low-can-moto-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Tarud</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[handesets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[motorla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://icecrums.com/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting numbers from Motorola handset business. Another example of what happens when you stop innovation. Apple has had 10 years of steady innovation. That is not easy to maintain, and why Apple is so great. 
(Via GigaOM.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting numbers from Motorola handset business. Another example of what happens when you stop innovation. Apple has had 10 years of steady innovation. That is not easy to maintain, and why Apple is so great. </p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/10/30/how-low-can-moto-go/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/gigaom.com');">GigaOM</a>.)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/icecrums/~4/437123249" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://icecrums.com/2008/10/30/how-low-can-moto-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://icecrums.com/2008/10/30/how-low-can-moto-go/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
